Newsletter >
Foreign Nativity and Mental Illness

January 7, 2008

Foreign Nativity May Not Always Protect Against Mental 
Disorders in the US 
 
Though all Latino immigrants tend to display better overall 
mental health compared to their US-born counterparts, a 
recent study by NIMH-funded researchers has found that the 
protective benefits of foreign nativity vary widely across 
subgroups of this population. Factors such as neighborhood 
stability, perceived discrimination, and the strength of 
family bonds all combine to influence the prevalence of 
mental disorders across distinctive Latino ethnic groups. 
The finding reflects varying immigration and acculturation 
processes experienced by Mexicans, Cubans, Puerto Ricans 
and other Latino groups. Results of the study were 
published in the July 2007 issue of Social Science and 
Medicine. 
 
The research team, lead by Dr. Margarita Alegria of Harvard 
University, used information from the National Latino and 
Asian-American Study (NLAAS) to examine the effect of 
foreign nativity on the prevalence of mental disorders 
within Latino immigrant populations. The researchers 
initially divided the survey population into two groups; 
Late-Arrival Immigrants (LAI) who arrived in the US after 
age six and those who arrived in the US before age six 
(IUSC). The latter group also included Latinos who were 
born in the United States, as native born and early-arrival 
immigrants share similar language skills and acculturation 
experiences. In contrast, late arrival immigrants may have 
limited English skills and closer connections to 
traditional customs, family structures, and religious 
values. Survey participants were further divided based on 
ethnic background and country of origin. 
 
These divisions allowed researchers to show that nativity 
is only part of the larger picture when considering 
susceptibility to various mental disorders. Previous 
studies of the “immigrant paradox,” which refers to the 
tendency of children of immigrants to have a higher 
prevalence of mental disorders than their parents, focused 
primarily on nativity while overlooking other sources of 
risk. By dividing the Latino population into subgroups 
based on country of origin, as well as late (LAI) and early 
(IUSC) arrival to the US researchers were able to identify 
other factors, such as familial and cultural ties, income 
disparities, and perceived social standing, which interact 
to influence the prevalence of mental disorders. 
 
For example, Mexican LAI immigrants showed lower risk of 
depressive disorders compared to their IUSC counterparts. 
However, when family cultural conflict and family burden 
were taken into account, LAI Mexicans experienced similar 
levels of risk for depression as IUSC. No differences in 
risk for anxiety disorders were found for LAI versus IUSC 
Latinos. Yet, surprisingly, results showed that immigrant 
families with incomes of $15,000 a year or less seemed to 
experience lower levels of anxiety disorders than those 
families who made above $35,000. The researchers proposed 
that the unexpected protective effect of poverty was likely 
due to a higher perceived social standing within the low 
income families. At the same time, lower-income families 
may have lowered expectations for success compared to their 
more affluent peers. This may help to limit some of the 
stress associated with trying to improve social standing 
and achievement. 
 
The study highlights the need for further investigation of 
the varying cultural and sociological influences that 
affect mental health in immigrant populations. Nativity 
alone may not be as protective as once thought. Rather, 
family harmony, marital status, and integration in 
employment may be key factors for decreased risk for 
depression and anxiety disorders. Including comparisons of 
immigration arrival across subgroups within an ethnic 
population in future studies could be a valuable tool in 
determining additional factors that may increase or 
decrease the risk for psychiatric disorders in Latino and 
other immigrant populations. 
 
Reference: 
Alegria, M., et al. Understanding differences in past year 
psychiatric disorders for Latinos living in the US. Social 
Science & Medicine. 2007 Jul;65(2):214-30.